For example, I've recently noticed people are falsely attributing quotes to people who didn't actually say them. These quotes are meant to unfairly harm reputations. No, Donald Trump did not saying that "Dr. Walter Palmer did nothing wrong and I will pay his legal fees." Likewise, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, never said that “Slavs, Latin and Hebrew immigrants are human weeds … a deadweight of human waste … Blacks, soldiers and Jews are a menace to the race.” Similarly, Obama is not running for a third term. No one is trying to establish Sharia Law in the United States. Planned Parenthood is not selling baby parts. Regardless of your political leanings, these are reputations these people and organizations do not deserve. If they lose funding or elections for the wrong reasons, I think we all lose.
Whenever you read something that seems implausible, it probably is. Check Snopes, check Politifact to confirm the truth in what you read. It is not just about making sure you are informed. It is about making sure everyone is informed. If you are able to correct people, and point out misinformation, you can propagate the correct information through your networks. And, in the political context, this is essential because we need to address real problems and issues, and not waste our time on nonsense.
The first Republican debate is tonight, and I am curious to see how everything goes. Not necessarily because I care deeply about the electoral process, but because there will be lots of gaffs and misspeaking. And it will be a bit of fun to parse out the truth and discuss it in my networks.
To end, here's a little humor about how trustworthy the internet is:

Yeah, the video is funny. I agree that we should doubt everything we read on the internet before we take it.
ReplyDelete